REPORTING & ANALYSIS

The whole picture.
The useful detail.

Turn completed checks into a clearer view of performance, exceptions and the next action.

Actual QUEST interface with fictional sample data

Actual QUEST screen · fictional sample data

READ THE DETAIL BEHIND THE VIEW

  1. 01
    Compare like with likeUse comparable checks and periods.
  2. 02
    Look for patternsReview distribution and recurring exceptions.
  3. 03
    Open the evidenceUnderstand what the summary represents.

Start with a signal.
Get to the evidence.

Review scheduled completion, overdue work and open actions. Then explore the records behind the result instead of treating a headline number as the answer.

Graphical submission analysis includes version-specific scores, distributions, trends and location comparisons. Question and section detail helps explain what changed. Export options support review outside the portal.

Keep the scope and period visible. Shared reporting reflects records received by the server; unsynchronised offline work is not yet part of that picture.

01

Completion

How much of the expected work has been completed? Use the period and task status to give the number context.

02

Quality

How did scored answers perform against their form rules? Completion and quality answer different questions.

03

Follow-through

Which findings and actions remain open, who owns them and what needs review next?

A few useful answers

Yes, within authorised scope. Compare equivalent forms and versions, and consider sample sizes and local context before drawing conclusions.

QUEST provides report and export workflows, including supported PDF, Excel and CSV outputs. Demonstrate your required report during the pilot.

Reporting reflects work received by the server. A completed offline check joins the shared view after successful synchronisation.

YOUR NEXT STEP

Bring us a checklist.
We’ll show you the possibilities.

A personal demonstration, shaped around your work.